On 2012/02/09 12:01, Bobby Beever <bobby.bee...@yahoo.com> wrote: > What do you prefer and or propose?
I don't understand the goal of this. First idea looks very dirty. DSD shouldn't be a special case, it's just yet another audio format. Replay gain cannot be applied because we don't have a software volume implementation for DSD. If you want bit-perfect playback, you don't want to enable replay gain or software volume. Since there is no DSD implementation, MPD will fail. > As the dsd2pcm code needs to remain state I also propose to > implement dsd2pcm into the convert_filter_plugin. Do you agree? Yes. And no. It doesn't belong in convert_filter_plugin, the call to dsd2pcm belongs in pcm_convert.c (and its neighbors). > Mixers/Volume control.. I think we somehow need to be able to > disable software (maybe also hardware) volume control. Would you > agree? I currently have no proposal other than adding enable/disable > state code to volume.c for a clean implementation. What are your > thoughts on this? No, why would volume.c know or care about DSD? It never sees any actual audio data. You confuse me. Max ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ _______________________________________________ Musicpd-dev-team mailing list Musicpd-dev-team@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/musicpd-dev-team
