On 2013/06/24 18:35, Alexander Sulfrian <alexan...@sulfrian.net> wrote:
> oh thats true. Maybe we want simply lock this region. I reworked the
> patch and add a static Mutex to the PulseOutput struct. So that the lock
> should affect all pulse outputs but nothing else.

That's even worse: if one Pulse server does not respond, all others
have to wait, too.

> Hope that this is fine. If not please give me advice how to make the
> code thread safe.

Don't use environment variables to pass data to a library.  If
libpulse doesn't support that, we're out of luck, and your feature
cannot be implemented properly.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Musicpd-dev-team mailing list
Musicpd-dev-team@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/musicpd-dev-team

Reply via email to