Hi there, as I am new to this list, I can’t reply directly, but this is an addition to this mail: http://www.mail-archive.com/mutopia-discuss@mutopiaproject.org/msg00255.html
1. Mutopia works in the public-domain point to this licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ But this is a retired licence that is not recommended any longer (since 2010 -- over 3 years). It is explained why and alternatives can be found there, too. 2. Another wish I would like to state here again: Could the Mutopia tagline be drastically beautified? To me this is against all typographical conventions and I would suggest: - One font size for the whole tagline - the licence is mentioned twice: in the tagline and in the copyright (one would suffice, my suggestion: copyright) - less text in general - details about licences can be explained on the Mutopia website, but if I use this piece, I feel less free and more annoyed by those wordy explanations (my personal opinion) 3. I am one of the possible contributers, Federico mentioned, that got no reply. I have now read Chris’ mail about February and I see the activity on this list here. That reassures me. After this first contribution is through and I know the procedures, I have a few more to add. Thanks for your work! Joram PS: This pad.fsfe.org thing is exciting :) _______________________________________________ Mutopia-discuss mailing list Mutopia-discuss@mutopiaproject.org http://lists.bcn.mythic-beasts.com/mailman/listinfo/mutopia-discuss
