* [email protected] <[email protected]> [2013-10-31 13:20]: > > But the solution is not to give everyone commit access. > > Don't get me wrong, but a high-quality patch in conjunction with > constructive track ticket seems enough for accepting the person as a > commiter into (and only into) the quick-moving partly stable branch.
Where's this "high quality" suddenly coming from? Who will be verifying the quality? > It's imho quite far from "give everyone commit access" :). I was referring to your proposal¹ to give everyone commit access | immediately (without any patch reviews etc.) who managed to create a patch that addresses an arbitrary trac ticket and adheres to the following rule: | The patch wouldn't have to break the build. No other rules would take | place and these aforementioned ones would be the only necessity. This is the opposite of enforcing "high quality" standards, and basically amounts to giving everyone commit access. Holger ¹ http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg08708.html
