Hi Holger, you're entirely right with my misuse of 'high-quality'. I should have quoted it. The submitter himself would be responsible for the quality. The point of this suggestion is that patches would be incorporated faster, but on the other hand they could be much faster abandoned (because the users will provide almost instant feedback about the issues they experience with these fast-incorporated patches). In majority cases this leads patch authors to polish them (also from the formal view like requesting review on mailing lists etc.).
Just my 2 cents. Regards -- Jan Pacner
