On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:16:20PM -0400, Derek Schrock wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:58:56AM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > This patch seems okay to me. Does anyone have any opposition to adding > > these new expandos? > > > > I was going to make a small change to the expandos and make them > optional.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding, but I don't see it necessary to make the expandos optional. They don't change any behavior unless you actually use them. But feel free to resubmit your patches as you see fit. > Seeing that there was already some objections to the delivery and > contents I was going to repatchbomb a split patch (one for %r/R and one > for attribution buffer change). This is a pretty small patch, so you don't have to split it out if you don't want. I think David saw them as having a bit different purposes, so suggested making them different patches, but for a one-liner it's not critical. -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA http://www.8t8.us/configs/gpg-key-transition-statement.txt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
