On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 02:24:02PM -0400, Derek Schrock wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 06:45:48PM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:16:20PM -0400, Derek Schrock wrote: > > > I was going to make a small change to the expandos and make them > > > optional. > > > > Perhaps I'm misunderstanding, but I don't see it necessary to make the > > expandos optional. They don't change any behavior unless you actually > > use them. But feel free to resubmit your patches as you see fit. > > I felt the expandos should be optional if the message doesn't have a To: > or Cc: header then if you're using them in your attribution the messages > looks cleaner without the two blank lines. > > attribution="...%?r?To: %r\n?..." > > In my case I thought about using some autocmd in vim to auto remove > blank To:/Cc: lines but figured it was better to do it in mutt. > > If something doesn't seem right about that let me know.
No, I did misunderstand. :-) That's just fine! > Ok It's a single patch I'll just give a day or two for any other comments and then I'll push it up. Thanks again for the patch! -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA http://www.8t8.us/configs/gpg-key-transition-statement.txt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
