On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:38:10AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > * On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 08:47AM +0200 Olaf Hering ([email protected]) muttered: > > For each iteration another copy of the message to be sent is stored in > > record > > in general that's a good think(tm). If sending fails for whatever reason > you don't loose the mail you where just trying to send, because there is > a local copy. > assuming that's even necessary, the _sensible_ thing to do in this scenario would be postponing the message instead.
but even that is overkill, as a sending failure throws you right back into the composition menu you just came from, so there is no higher risk of losing anything than before. iow, this is indeed a bug (which does bug me from time to time).
