* On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 09:55AM +0200 Oswald Buddenhagen ([email protected]) muttered: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:38:10AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > > * On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 08:47AM +0200 Olaf Hering ([email protected]) muttered: > > > For each iteration another copy of the message to be sent is stored in > > > record > > > > in general that's a good think(tm). > > you don't loose the mail you where just trying to send, because there is > > a local copy. > > > assuming that's even necessary, the _sensible_ thing to do in this > scenario would be postponing the message instead.
right > but even that is overkill, as a sending failure throws you right back > into the composition menu you just came from, so there is no higher > risk of losing anything than before. No. Sending from the command line, in scripts, the error might come up later during delivery,... Michael -- PGP-Key-ID: EEE7D043 Jabber: [email protected]
