On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 05:04:09PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > The current behavior when doing group reply with reply_self is not > correct in the following case. Given this example: > > From: myself > To: someone > Cc: alice, bob > > Mutt will generate the following reply when doing a group reply with > reply_self enabled: > > From: myself > To: someone, alice, bob > > reply_self is completely ignored, and Mutt fill the To field joining > the To and Cc fields from the original message.
I think the patch is correct, but I'd like to hear other's opinions. $reply_self is not completely ignored: initially "myself" is added to the To list. But subsequently, because $metoo is unset, it is stripped off. Setting $metoo disables the subsequent removal, producing the op's desired behavior. (r)eply "works" with 'set reply_self; unset metoo' because the resulting To list only has one address and Cc is empty, and 'nometoo' turns itself off in this case. So the question is if (g)roup reply with 'set reply_self; unset metoo' should disable the $nometoo behavior. I think so, but please chime in! -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
