On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 06:11:33PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday, 2017-09-22 13:16:38 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > So the question is if (g)roup reply with 'set reply_self; unset metoo' > > should disable the $nometoo behavior. I think so, but please chime in! > > Might make sense. But I'd not expect it. I'd rather not expect > $reply_self to affect group reply at all, only normal reply. So whether > myself is in the list of recipients in a group reply should depend only > on $metoo. > > But maybe that's me, I find the behaviour of an unset $reply_self > logical and setting $reply_self rather odd..
I'm afraid I'm not that familiar with mutt internals in order to know which way it's better. I just think that the current behavior is wrong, and needs to be fixed so that group replies to an email sent by myself don't end up batching the Cc into the To field. Thanks, Roger.
