* on Wednesday, 2019-06-26 09:13 +0200, Moritz Barsnick <barsn...@gmx.net> wrote:
> > > hard to see the difference between 1.3k and 1.3M at a quick glimpse > > > across the index. > > > > Yes, perhaps the reason I do not use %c. And the fact that the > > scaling facteur is on the right instead of the left makes this > > even harder (that's a bit like the American dates MMDDYYYY). > > That's mutt_pretty_size(). If we wanted to overengineer this, this > function could be expanded or cloned to be fixed to a certain > granularity (such as k or M). (I'm not making this a feature request. > OTOH, why not craft my own patch? ;-)) I also don't use %c for the same reason. Fixing the units to 'k' would make me switch to %c instead of %l as well...
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
