> > So why mutt implements a pop3 protocol? Why do we need this when we > > have fetchmail? > > It's not needed. It should be removed. > > Mutt's POP3 support went in before fetchmail was really existent/stable. Or, preferably, mutt should handle POP3 mailboxes in the same way that it handles IMAP and other mailboxes. So messages remain on the server until the user asks them to be deleted. Or was there an objection to this proposal? Edmund
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP server Shao Zhang
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP ser... rutger
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP ser... Tim Pierce
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP ser... Fairlight
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP ser... Jeremy Blosser
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP ser... Brendan Cully
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP ser... Mikko Hänninen
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP ser... Tim Pierce
- OT: Re: how to set up alternate SMTP... rutger
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP ser... David DeSimone
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP ser... Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP ser... David DeSimone
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP server Howard Arons
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP server Eugene Lee
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP server Rich Lafferty
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP server Rich Lafferty
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP server Tim Pierce
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP server Manoj Kasichainula
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP server Tim Pierce
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP server Daniel Eisenbud
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP server Rich Lafferty