Nathan Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why (rhetorical question) can't I do it with alternates?
>
> alternates dre@chronic\.net
> alternates snoop@lbc\.ca.us
Actually, it used to be that way, but that was before Mutt really
supported regular expressions. Once the regexp ability was added to
Mutt, a short survey of the then-current Mutt users showed that everyone
thought it would be just fine to make a single regexp that matched all
addresses. So there you have it, the democratic process at work. :)
> Does that just look much cleaner?
Yes, it does.
Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wishlist?
No disrespect intended, Sven, but do people read your wish list?
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not
Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson
UX WTEC Engineer | PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
