On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Dirk Pirschel wrote: > > As a result, I pretty much always build mutt with --disable-fcntl > > --enable-flock on linux. > What is the difference between "fcntl" and "flock" ? The man page of flock(2) on my Linux system says: NOTES flock(2) does not lock files over NFS. Use fcntl(2) instead: that does work over NFS, given a sufficiently recent version of Linux and a server which supports lock ing. So flock(2) may not be the best idea if you want to access your mail via NFS... Ciao Roland -- * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.spinnaker.de/ *
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Mikko Hänninen
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Lalo Martins
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) David DeSimone
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 3... Thomas Roessler
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 3... Marius Gedminas
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errn... David DeSimone
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Stephan Seitz
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Bill Nottingham
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Joshua Rodman
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Dirk Pirschel
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Roland Rosenfeld
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Mikko Hänninen
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Roland Rosenfeld
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Dan Lipofsky