Roland Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 17 Nov 1999: > So flock(2) may not be the best idea if you want to access your mail > via NFS... Apparently. IMHO, any incoming mail folders which are accessed over NFS should be in Maildir format anyway, it's pretty much the only sane choice. As this thread quite clearly shows, file locking and NFS don't really mix. Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs / Practice random acts of kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Lalo Martins
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) David DeSimone
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 3... Thomas Roessler
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 3... Marius Gedminas
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errn... David DeSimone
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Stephan Seitz
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Bill Nottingham
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Joshua Rodman
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Dirk Pirschel
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Roland Rosenfeld
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Mikko Hänninen
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Roland Rosenfeld
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Dan Lipofsky