I wouldn't call my reasons "grave", but I do have a certain amount of preference for
MH folders. However, given the benefits of mutt over raw MH, it wouldn't exactly be a
show stopper if I couldn't use MH for incoming mail.
Thanks for your comments.
Phil
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 02:48:48PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-03-01 07:15:28 -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
>
> > Yes, I've noticed that mutt behaves in a rather unreliable
> > fashion when it comes to this, too.
>
> The mh code is far from perfect. It should be fine for converting
> legacy mh-style folders to something else, but I wouldn't use it in
> production for incoming folders. If there aren't any grave reasons
> why you have to stick with mh folders, I'd suggest you switch to
> maildir.
>
> --
> http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
>
--
Phil Staub Dragonfly Software Consulting Company.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8196 SW Hall Blvd, Suite 104
503-641-3440 x33 Beaverton, OR 97008
"Unix: because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
