Even majordomo can be configured to allow attachments - and
multipart/alternative, however unacceptable, is an attachment and does not
violate the RFCs (strictly speaking).
Not violating RFCs does not stop html mail from being a pain in the ass ;)
-s
Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
>> Which get's even more interesting when you have a mailing list
>> processor which attaches it's own signature as text/plain in the
>> same multipart/alternative. You see only the signature. :-(
>
> Such software is obviously broken. But I'd probably consider a mailing
> list processor broken that lets mulipart/alternative through ...
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at staff.juno.com
"Why be a man when you can be a success?"
-- Bertold Brecht
