Re: spamfilter for procmail

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Mikko H�nninen proclaimed on mutt-users that: 

> I don't know, I think the annoyance factor reduction is quite
> significant, and that shouldn't be discounted.  True, there are no real
> material cost savings achievable at this point.
 
 As a sysadmin for a largish isp + portal, my interests center more around the
 cost factor ;)   I prefer to do my spam blocking at the company mailserver ...
 and have procmail to deal with bozos I don't want to talk to, but wouldn't
 want to block across a dozen domains.
 
-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
Maybe Computer Science should be in the College of Theology.
                -- R. S. Barton