On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Charles Curley wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 01:56:21PM -0800, Myrddin muttered: > One reason is security. GPG is free software, PGP is captive. This means > you can get the GPG source, read it and compile it for yourself. you also compile PGP (and presumably find the time to read it). -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com
- gnupg vs pgp? Myrddin
- Re: gnupg vs pgp? Lars Hecking
- Re: gnupg vs pgp? Thorsten Haude
- Re: gnupg vs pgp? Charles Curley
- Re: gnupg vs pgp? Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: gnupg vs pgp? Charles Curley
- Re: gnupg vs pgp? rex
- Re: gnupg vs pgp? Charles Curley
- Re: gnupg vs pgp? Lars Hecking
- Re: gnupg vs pgp? Thorsten Haude
- Re: gnupg vs pgp? Ralf Hildebrandt
- Re: gnupg vs pgp? Thorsten Haude
- Re: gnupg vs pgp? Ralf Hildebrandt
- Re: gnupg vs pgp? Lars Hecking
- Re: gnupg vs pgp? Thorsten Haude