Tim Whitehead proclaimed on mutt-users that: > more flexibility (hence configurability) besides the fact that it claims that it > "makes sendmail obsolete" (http://www.qmail.org). Everybody claims something or the other ... -s (tried sendmail 8.11.2 betas lately? they rock) -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin
- smtp server config? Joe Copeland
- Re: smtp server config? Jacob Kuntz
- Re: smtp server config? Jeff Turner
- Re: smtp server config? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: smtp server config? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: smtp server config? Tim Legant
- Re: Multiple delete Phil Sexton
- Re: smtp server config? Tim Whitehead
- Re: smtp server config? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: smtp server config? Igor Pruchanskiy
- Re: smtp server config? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: smtp server config? Myrddin
- Re: smtp server config? Tim Legant
- Re: smtp server config? CB
- Re: smtp server config? CB
- Re: smtp server config? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: smtp server config? Igor Pruchanskiy
- Re: smtp server config? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: smtp server config? Raghavendra Bhat