On 09.07.2001 10:31:16 Dominik Vogt wrote:
> I strongly disagree. Of course it does not make sense to
> re-implement procmail in mutt. But the average user does not need
> 5 percent of procmail's functionality anyway. On the other hand,
> many users like to have some mail filtering but are unable to set
> up with mutt. I believe this is one of the most common features
> people expect from their mail client - and I don't mean UNIX
> freaks but just an office user like our secretary.
Pardon me, and I know that this may not be popular to say here - but do
"ordinary" users actually use mutt? I'd expect "secratary types" to use
something like Evolution, as it's "easier" to use for these kind of
people.
What I mean to say is, people which use mutt certainly aren't the common
John Does and like to tweak their computer and all. Secretaries
(normally) need a mouse....
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de
iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen
Uptime: 2 days 17 hours 51 minutes
