On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:17:55AM +0200, Christoph Maurer wrote:
> The Problem is not PGP, but Outlook.
Ah? New to me ;)
> I defined two macros in my muttrc, so I can encrypt and sign
> messages in a way MS Outlook (and a lot of other Windows Email
> Clients) understand:
That's what I did too ... but mine look different. Yours work better,
thanks!
> The problem about this solution is that you'll have to know whether the
> recipient of your mail uses a PGP/Mime capable MUA (which are only
> mutt and Eudora AFAIK) or not.
That's not really a problem. Of most of the folks I share mails with I
know what they're working with.
> PGP/Mime has great advantages so I do not understand why so many
> MTAs cannot deal with it.
I just asked this question to news:microsoft.public.de.outlook - no
response yet. I think they don't really know what they're doing.
Browsing the archive of this group is really shocking sometimes ...
Thank you!
Andre
--
"Windows 98 ist für Weicheier -- richtige Männer arbeiten mit Windows 2000."
(Peter Ehrbar in daf, leider mit falscher Message-ID)
