> Old-style PGP isn't cleanly specified, and has problems with
> non-us-ascii character sets. It kind of works when you are doing
> text-e-mail in English, but that's all.
>
> PGP/MIME doesn't have this problem, and is cleanly specified (RFC
> 3156).
I'm reading the RFC now. Thanks for the reference.
--
-Ben Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.superutility.net/
- GPG, mutt and Outlook Express Andre Bonhote
- Re: GPG, mutt and Outlook Express David T-G
- Re: GPG, mutt and Outlook Express Volker Moell
- Re: GPG, mutt and Outlook Express Andre Bonhote
- Re: GPG, mutt and Outlook Express Christoph Maurer
- Re: GPG, mutt and Outlook Express Andre Bonhote
- Re: GPG, mutt and Outlook Express Ben Jones
- Re: GPG, mutt and Outlook Express Thomas Roessler
- Ben Jones
PGP signature