Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [About random signatures in Mutt] > Well, this is a bit (a lot?) OT, but here is the line in my .muttrc: > > set signature="~/.random_sig/random_sig.py ~/.random_sig/my_sigs|" > > (where my_sigs is a file in the same format as the fortune files, and > random_sig.py is a script to read that file and print a random one of > them. I won't bore you with the actual script, though :)
Ah, thank you. Hmm... one thing I don't understand; why there is a pipe after the filename where your script picks up the signature? Or is it part of the filename or what? :-) >> I would use KMail if I would think it to be better than Mutt, but you >> can do a lot with KMail. > > I would use whatever I thought was the best. And I do ;) This is exactly what I do, as well. What a surprise, huh? ;-) Well, seriously - I like Mutt. I like Mutt a lot. Actually, I haven't tried many other MUAs, because I have been so overly happy with Mutt. Glad to try other agents, of course. If it's for console, that is. X software is not for me. :-) -- Jussi Ekholm, "Everything is so fine it could be a little, ill flower don't let your mind take you in misery [EMAIL PROTECTED] all the feelings you're not so much pleased http://ekhowl.goa-head.org they're just to take you to sweet harmony"
