Nope, this is just by me pressing b to bounce the message. The only thing I can think of is that it is being displayed inline via antiword. If that is the case, is it either one or the other then? i.e. Being able to bounce attachments properly and not have them displayed inline, or not being able to bounce messages correctly and have them displayed inline.
Collin On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 08:57:08AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Collin -- > > ...and then Collin Peters said... > % If I bounce a message that has (For example) a .doc attachment, the > % receipient gets all the headers and .doc is inline with the message and > ... > > Not to be too picky, but are you using 'f'orward instead of 'b'ounce to > send along the message? Forwarding will rewrite the message and could, > indeed, make some changes -- and so your settings are worth noticing. > Bouncing, on the other hand, takes the message and feeds it directly back > to the MTA to pass on, with no other changes -- and so if the .doc wasn't > in-line for you, it shouldn't be in-line for your recipient. > > > % I've read the list archives on forwarding a message with attachments but > % these don't seem to apply to bouncing. > > HTH & HAND > > > % > % Collin > > > :-D > -- > David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles > (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie > (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! >
