On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:30:19PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I must say that the its speed in > processing IMAP stores strikes me as slow. I think this is because > mutt doesn't seem to have any caching mechanism. As a result, each > tim you open an imap subfolder you have to wait for it to spool th > count. > > If you have a folder with lots of messages this can be a substantial > wait time. yes. I thought it was because of only using a P90 as IMAP Server, but after changing to NFS mounted ~/Mail everything is really faster (with the Same Maildir folders Courier IMAPd used!) > If you archived locally and just kept y our inbox for initial > reception it might not be too bad... well ... I have this computer on my LAN and also use it for archiving mails, so I have access from everywhere I am.
-- Christian Ordig Germany
