David, I use 1.3.9i and the IMAP functionality, while admittedly beyond comprehension in better than the 1.2x series, is still very slow.
I'd really like to get more Mutt users here, but the slow spool and respool of the IMAP folders is a showstopper (versus PINE IMAP or Netscape Mail). It's a reasonable wait if you keep your IMAP folders < 50 msgs. steven On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 11:43:42PM -0600, David Rock wrote: >On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:37:55PM -0500, Samuel Padgett wrote: >> I'm considering switching to IMAP. How good is Mutt as an IMAP >> client? I'm currently just accessing local mbox files directly, >> but I'd like to be able to access my mail from other machines. > >I use IMAP to access the Exchange server at work and have been pretty >happy with it. You MUST be using a more current mutt, though (1.2.5i is >SEVERELY lacking in IMAP support) > >-- >David Rock >[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Steven G. Harms [my opinions are my own, not my employer's] Some mail readers may interpret this message as having an 'attachment' this is actually my cryptographic signature. Protect your privacy by using cryptography. You can get my public encryption key at: http://pgp.dtype.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE84048BF
msg23597/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
