On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Brian Clark wrote:

> * Knute ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 28. 2002 11:04]:

> > I'm currently using debian, so I don't know about other distros. What
> > I've found is that with debian, there is mutt (linked with slang),
> > and mutt.curses (linked with ncurses). As I use kbd shortcuts anyway,
> > I simply set up a shortcut to mutt.curses and it took care of the
> > problems that I was having with the color. And setting up an alias
> > named mutt to point to /usr/bin/mutt.curses isn't to hard either. 8o)

> What version/release of Debian are you using? I'm running a mix of woody
> and sid and my mutt is using ncurses rather than slang, and I didn't
> have to download any special version:

> (~)% ldd `which mutt`
>         libncurses.so.5 => /lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x4001e000)

> (There is no mutt.curses on my machine) 

> The package I'm using is mutt_1.3.27-1_i386.deb from sid.

> Not being a smart arse, <g> just pointing out that there may be
> differences in stable/testing/unstable.

The name is mutt.ncurses,  and I didn't have do dl anything extra to
have it on here.  Don't actually know where it came from to be honest
with you.  I do have both slang and ncurses on my machine.
And I am using unstable as well.
And I'm using the same package version as well,  I am also using the
urf8 one as well. (Don't quite know the diff atm, but it's there.)

When I do a dpkg -S mutt.ncurses it was the mutt-utf8 package that
created it.   Since that is the one that is linked to slang.

Attachment: msg23921/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to