Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jussi Ekholm said on Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 09:31:06PM +0200: >> Yes, I know. At least this proves, that I managed to upset people >> with my child walk of PGP signatures (I agree, I should've selected >> more appropriate place for testing it for the first time); or would >> I get a "lecture" (saying it with no offense) from just joking, >> otherwise? > > Not at all; you got it working, quickly, and other people will benefit > from that experience. Here was a great place, IMNERHO.
Well, you make me blush here... ;-) I think, that what comes to my mail about the PGP with Mutt doesn't particularily benefit other people, as the thread itself wasn't that informative. Or did you mean it some other way? But still I think, that testing -- whatever it is -- shouldn't be necessarily done in a pretty high trafficed mailing list, or it could grow in big proportions. Though, this is just my opinion. And yeah, I got it working -- thanks to all the people who helped me with this issue. Especially one site, that was posted to my personal address was *very* helpful. And when one reads, reads and reads -- and then continues reading about some subject, learning is inevitable. :-) -- Jussi Ekholm | A Elbereth Gilthoniel, silivren penna míriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] | o menel aglar elenath! Na-chaered palan-díriel ekh @ IRCNet | o galadhremmin ennorath, Fanuilos le linnathon http://ekhowl.goa-head.org | nef aear, sí nef aearon
msg26023/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
