On Mar 25, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-20 03:23]: > > Second, it is wrong as far as it goes. flea(1) doesn't send anything > > to debian.org. > > SUBMIT="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > DEBIAN_SUBMIT="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > hmm... isn't DEBIAN_SUBMIT used at all?
Oops, I forgot, flea does check to see if it thinks you are running Debian, and if so it submits a Cc to the Debian BTS. But that's only a Cc, the mutt BTS is the one at guug.de. > > Also, it's not that useful to suggest people send bugs to mutt-users, > > since most people that frequest this list aren't developers. mutt -v > > requests bug reports go to mutt-dev, and that's where they should go. > > well, considering the amount of data this generates > mutt-dev isn't the place to take in such huge mails, either. mutt-dev is the place where the developers want the bugs to come so that the appropriate people see them, and if discussion needs to happen, it happens with the appropriate people around. > "mutt-dev". But please refrain from posting dumping your complete setup > there. It's been established that it's better if they post to much info than not enough. That's why flea behaves as it does. You may not want that traffic, but that's your own choice about what kinds of lists you yourself want to monitor. Bug reports to mutt-dev are expected to be verbose. > Remember that sending to the mailing list requires subscription; mails > from unsubscribed addresses will go to a moderator - and I'm not whether > anyone really moderates those mails... Someone moderates those mails. Usually several someones do.
msg26100/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
