* Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 00:26]: > > % folder-hook . set record="" > > % folder-hook =local set record="=local" > > % folder-hook =haviworks set record="=haviworks" > > % folder-hook =ebase set record="=ebase" > .. I want fcc set to the mbox folder where > the list email is in to which I am replying. > It's a big PITA for dozens of folders, created by procmail. > I would have thought for procmail to be in > very common use with people who use mutt. > It requires a folder-hook for each list - blerrg.
mutt is no replacement for procmail. if your problem is with procmail then you should be posting elsewhere. there's fcc-hook and fcc-save-hook and with header editing you can also use your editor's feature to adjust the Fcc. have you tried these? besides, when you have "set save_name" then mails sent to listname@domain get saved in +listname. and if you need a different name for +listname, well, there's "ln -s" to create symlinks! > I take it that the outgoing email doesn't actually get a fcc: header, "set copy" and bingo - Fcc gets set! Sven === # mkdir ~/Mail $ cd ~/Mail $ ln -s foo-l fools $ cat test alias foo FOO List <foo-l@domain> set copy set save_name set folder=~/Mail $ echo blah | mutt -F test foo $ ls -l fools $ mutt -f fools