On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:25:05AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-04 00:26]: > > > % folder-hook . set record="" > > > % folder-hook =local set record="=local" > > > % folder-hook =haviworks set record="=haviworks" > > > % folder-hook =ebase set record="=ebase" > > .. I want fcc set to the mbox folder where > > the list email is in to which I am replying. > > It's a big PITA for dozens of folders, created by procmail. > > I would have thought for procmail to be in > > very common use with people who use mutt. > > It requires a folder-hook for each list - blerrg. > > mutt is no replacement for procmail. > if your problem is with procmail > then you should be posting elsewhere. > > there's fcc-hook and fcc-save-hook and with header editing > you can also use your editor's feature to adjust the Fcc. > have you tried these? > > besides, when you have "set save_name" then mails > sent to listname@domain get saved in +listname. > and if you need a different name for +listname, > well, there's "ln -s" to create symlinks! >
Don't you think it is a common sense to save a copy of outgoing message to the *same* folder as you are reading from? If that is so, I think we should make it easier to do this. Another common need of saving a copy is to save all of them in a single "Outbox" folder, which mutt is already capable of doing. Cheers. Jun
