Hello Rocco and ALL,
On Saturday, April 20, 2002 at 2:37:21 PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> I spent some time on testing. In my case, all signatures GPG can
> sucessfully verify while mutt saying it can't have rewritten
> content-type headers by formail.
This could be that something was modified by proc/formail that is
necessary to PGP verify... I propose something:
You, David, Thorsten, and anybody else suffering from the same
problem, copy one or two of the unverifiable mails to a temporary
mailbox, zip it, and send to me privately the gz. If I find something
different from the same mails I have in my mutt-users archive, we will
know that's something bad in your delivery process. If I find nothing
different, and can verify them, this will mean bad PGP config. I'll
summarize the list.
David: You can include one of your own mails from your record box.
Just make clear what is what.
Bye! Alain.
