Hello David,
On Monday, April 22, 2002 at 3:35:19 PM -0500, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> ....and then Rocco Rutte said...
> .... and here's clue number two.
^^^^
Note here the 4 dots, when you sent only 3...
> So *now* what do you get?
Just to confuse things up, I could not verify this one!
gpg: BAD signature from "David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
And in Mutt's status line:
PGP signature could NOT be verified.
It's of course because of my found but still unsolved local delivery
problem. Once the superfluous dots removed by hand, gpg: Good sig and
Mutt: succesfull verification.
This time it's that your mail was plain/text *not* QP encoded. In
this case of course prepending dots are not encoded, and that's normal.
Bye! Alain.
--
Give your computer's unused idle processor cycles to a scientific goal:
The Genome@home project at <URL:http://genomeathome.stanford.edu/>.
