On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:39:31PM -0400, Ken Weingold wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2002, Will Yardley wrote: > > perhaps you could explain what functionality is missing in Putty that > > SecureCRT has? for certain functions, SecureCRT is a lot better, but for > > many users, Putty is easier to use and provides the desired > > SecureCRT is just a lot more robust in pretty much every way. Session > management I find infinitely better. One thing that pisses me off > about Putty's is (correct me if I'm wrong) that if you make changes > while the session is open, it doesn't give you the option to save it, > just apply it to the current. And SCRT's mapped keys really saved my
This pissed us off as well. In fact, it made us scream and shout. -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V A) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charite Campus Virchow-Klinikum Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Referat V A - Kommunikationsnetze - Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916 Yesterday it worked. Today it is not working. Windows is like that.