On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:39:08PM +0100, Bruno Postle wrote: > On Tue 17-Sep-2002 at 01:20:09 -0400, PeterKorman wrote: > > > > My current method places messages 1 and 3 in my "sent" folder. > > Message 2 goes into my inbox. > > > > I could automatically put everything I send in both my inbox > > and my sent folder. > > > > That would solve the thread problem. But would duplicate each > > message I send to 2 places. > > Personally, I have stopped using separate 'sent' and 'received' > mailboxes. It is much more natural to group mail by context - ie. a > separate mailbox for each job, project, relative etc.. > > > I guess I need a kind of virtual folder that joins my outgoing and > > incoming without duplicating any data. > > That isn't possible with mutt (though I _almost_ got it working by > misusing the compressed folders feature). > > -- > Bruno
I guess since I'm running on linux, with Maildir, I could brute force the solution by creating a hard link to all replies in my sent folder. Is there any caviat associated with something like this? Thanks. [JPK] -- GnuPG: ECBA EA08 C3C1 251E 5FB5 D196 F8C8 F8B7 AB60 234D
msg31000/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
