* On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 Javier Rojas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > It should tag all messages, whether collapsed or not. After all, it tags > all the *threads* that match a given criteria.
No it shouldn't. Never operate on non-visible messages. You might argue it should un-collapse all threads that match and then tag them. That would would be a really nice feature actually. Un-collapse threads when messages are matched by any operation. Any takers? > Collapse and limit are different. When using limit, I'm restricting the > range of my actions (tagging) to a subset of the messages. Collapsing > threads is just a convenient way of presenting the mailbox. So, > collapsing threads should not mess with tagging. It's just a view. So mutt should <delete-pattern> messages in collapsed threads? Messages you cannot see and therefor check that it's ok to delete them? Doesn't feel right to me. Now it that feature mentioned above existed... ;) Michael -- BOFH excuse #241: _Rosin_ core solder? But... PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC1A44DD Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
