On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 05:10:35PM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote: > Wow. I mean, wow. > > You're missing another alternative. Just don't post.
Oh, as to the nature of your comments... Perhaps you mean to suggest that you think I'm arrogant. Well, if so, that's true, I am arrogant. But I'm also right. My methods minimize the time spent reviewing unwanted mail, while also GUARANTEEING ZERO LOST MAIL WITH 100% CERTAINTY. No other anti-spam methodology can do the latter while still doing the former. That makes mine technically superior. Period. To me, not loosing mail is more important than minimizing spam, but fortunately I can do both. I may be arrogant, but I'm also very good at what I do; and my participation on this list and others has helped a lot of people over the years (though perhaps less so recently, as I become more jaded and bitter as I age)... -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers.
pgpuXpPZOYAwo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
