* Cameron Simpson <c...@zip.com.au> [2009-07-11 19:37 -0500]:
> On 10Jul2009 13:48, Nicolas Rachinsky <mutt-user...@ml.turing-complete.org> 
> wrote:
> | * Rocco Rutte <pd...@gmx.net> [2009-07-10 13:44 +0200]:
> | > I don't know if I mentioned this already, but I think I once
> | > hacked support for read-only variables in mutt-ng that would
> | > expose certain internal settings.
> |
> | I think, this could be very useful.
>
> Me too. Witness the hoop jumping I and others have recently done to
> get that, also the worse hoop jumping to then _use_ that value in an
> external/shell command.
>
> | Message-ID of the current message, filename of the current message
> | (for maildir/mh folders).

+1 please!  Also, would it be very difficult to make mutt read more than
one line when using backtics?  Actually, that's a different subject and
probably needs its own feature request.

>  - setenv ENVVAR "mutt-string-with-$mutt-vars"
>      to get mutt variables available to an external command

This would be really useful.

>  - push muttvar "new value"
>    pop muttvar
>      to make a number of macros much easier to write; currently
>      some of my macros must know that I use a particular setting,
>      and that in turn means I must know to not alter that setting

Not something I'd thought of... intereseting.

Regards,
-- 
dave [ please don't CC me ]

Reply via email to