Hello Dermot, Am 2010-07-16 20:34:39, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > You're right, I went to check the changelogs [1] and saw that there > are some Debian patches [2] in versions 1.5.13-1.1, 1.5.20-7 to give > /tmp/muttXXXXXX like names. It's been over 5 years since I've used > Mutt in a multiuser environment so I haven't had to worry too much > about the tmp files. > > [1] > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/m/mutt/mutt_1.5.20-9/changelog > [2] > http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/mutt/1.5.20-9/upstream/311296-rand-mktemp.patch
The question is: Why do the mutt developer not include this patch?
Such things should be standard.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ######################
Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux
itsyst...@tdnet France EURL itsyst...@tdnet UG (limited liability)
Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack
Apt. 917 (homeoffice)
50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstraße 17
67100 Strasbourg/France 77694 Kehl/Germany
Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil
Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix
<http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.flexray4linux.org/>
<http://www.debian.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.can4linux.org/>
Jabber linux4miche...@jabber.ccc.de
ICQ #328449886
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
