On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 05:10:38PM -0700, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:54:19PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:For example, this post to gnupg-users absolutely IS a traditional in-line PGP message:http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/users/52282?do=post_view_threaded#52282 A casual glance suggests there are many such messages.Again, I don't have a problem with this. It's just that the only flag showing, in fact, is just 'L' for the list. Nothing else, until after I view the message of the list. It's entirely inconsistent with the 100+ mailboxes that I change to every day.
There are two tests you can do to see if there's something going wrong, or whether mutt is behaving as designed.
Open the gnupg-users list. With the index displayed, search for "~h 'multipart/signed'". That looks for the PGP/MIME header that Mutt uses to flag a message as signed. If you find a match, but there isn't an s or S in the message flags, then there might be something else going on. But if you get "Not found", then Mutt is behaving as designed: there aren't any PGP/MIME messages in that mailbox, so Mutt won't show a PGP flag until you open some traditional messages in the pager.
Another test would be to find a message that shows up with the signed flag in some other mail box, and temporarily copy it to the gpg-users mailbox. Then open gpg-users and see if it shows up with the signed flag there. If so, then again Mutt is behaving as designed. If it disappears, then there might be something awry with your config, or a bug in Mutt.
Ed
signature.txt
Description: Digital signature
