On Wednesday, 22 June 2011 at 08:35, jurri...@rivierenland.xs4all.nl wrote: > From: David Champion <d...@uchicago.edu> > Date: Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:25:46PM -0500 > > * On 21 Jun 2011, Jurriaan wrote: > > > on screen, I see things like > > > > > > 50 21-06-11 Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx ( 1.2K) Xxxxxx xxxx xxxxx > > > 51 21-06-11 Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (13433K) Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > The sizes of messages with mime components (mostly html messages) are > > > much to big. Given that this is a router, without strace or gdb (well, > > > > Are you certain? That doesn't look too surprising for an HTML message > > with inline images. > > If I save the message to disk, it's only 13 kilobytes. There are no > inline images, it a text-part and the same as html, but no images. I'll > append the headers below. I'm not too sure I'd be happy receiving 133 > megabytes messages... > > > > > Have you tried copying it to another machine and running mutt on it > > there? > > Yes, on a regular AMD64 machine running Debian Unstable and mutt > 1.5.21-5 from Debian, it shows as 13K in the index. > There is no Content-Length field in the headers at all. Still, I think > mutt is doing something to determine the length of the message - perhaps > something else that just looking at the file.
Might be related to this patch: https://dev.mutt.org/trac/changeset/5d96f24efa85 If you can rebuild mutt on your router, try reverting that.
