Doh! My reply went to Peter instead of list! Bad mutt! On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 04:00:19PM -0500, Peter Davis wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:48:45AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15:41PM +0000, Chris Green wrote: > > > What does everyone else here do for collecting mail and filtering mail > > > with mutt? > > > > Fetchmail and procmail. Ugly, but ubiquitous and reliable. > > Same here. I keep meaning to hook in an adaptive spam filter, but I > haven't bothered so far. Maybe mutt just makes it so easy to quickly > triage my mail that it hasn't seemed worth it. > /me too - the weirdnesses of procmail do my head in (too many things which get routed to deviant mailboxes, and a general need to allow multiple mailboxes for anything, such as lkml, which exceeds about 51 MB), but I have a setup which works _adequately_ [ had to add a 4th lkml mailbox at the end of last month : my mailboxes get rolled-over at the start of the month ].
ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
