On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:18:23PM +0000, Tony's unattended mail wrote: > On 2012-11-20, Patrick Shanahan <ptilopt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Original text is fine unwrapped, but should not be sent that way. You > > should not impose on the reciever but sent mat'l in a manner that would be > > presented as one *should* expect. > > Recipients should not impose on composers. Otherwise Larry would > demand that Alice use 40 characters for his smartphone, and Bob would > demand 72 characters for his old PET computer, and Eddy would demand > that Alice break at 132 characters for his extra wide dual-headed LCD.
I really can't believe I'm about to say this, but: HTML solves this problem entirely. There, I said it. -Jeremy -- .O. Jeremy Kitchen (o_ ..O kitc...@kitchen.io //\ OOO twitter.com/kitchen V_/_
pgp4CMWCdPhPj.pgp
Description: PGP signature