On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:18:23PM +0000, Tony's unattended mail wrote:
> On 2012-11-20, Patrick Shanahan <ptilopt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Original text is fine unwrapped, but should not be sent that way.  You
> > should not impose on the reciever but sent mat'l in a manner that would be
> > presented as one *should* expect.
> 
> Recipients should not impose on composers.  Otherwise Larry would
> demand that Alice use 40 characters for his smartphone, and Bob would
> demand 72 characters for his old PET computer, and Eddy would demand
> that Alice break at 132 characters for his extra wide dual-headed LCD.

I really can't believe I'm about to say this, but:

HTML solves this problem entirely.

There, I said it.

-Jeremy

-- 
.O.    Jeremy Kitchen     (o_
..O   kitc...@kitchen.io  //\
OOO  twitter.com/kitchen  V_/_

Attachment: pgp4CMWCdPhPj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to