On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:00:25PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 15.12.12 17:03, Christian Brabandt wrote: > That has the advantage that the [list-gumpf] is gone not only from the > index, but also from the edit-headers in vim, when replying.
It also has the disadvantage that the [list-gumpf] is gone not only from the index, but from the message entirely. Sometimes knowing by way of which list you received a particular message (especially in the distant past) is useful. Plus sometimes (e.g. if you're forwarding the message off list to a group of people) your recipients will want or need that info... The procmail solution is a bad one IMO. If we all have this feature, you don't need to care if it's in the subject line; those who want it can see it and those who don't need not. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
pgpzKGQaIo9oq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
