On 09Apr2024 07:11, Michael Kjörling <ba47c4919...@ewoof.net> wrote:
On 9 Apr 2024 07:32 +1000, from c...@cskk.id.au (Cameron Simpson):
_Or_ you could "set sendmail=" to a script of your own to add a
message-id
header - that is what mutt uses to deliver the message to a mail system -
you could add a header there then pass the message on to whatever you had
mutt using before.
Wouldn't that at a minimum cause a discrepancy between the message-ID
of what is actually sent, and of what is stored in the Fcc?
If mutt made one, which I gather it actually does (I had thought not).
Agree such a script should never replace an existing message-id.
Cheers,
Cameron Simpson <c...@cskk.id.au>
