stuart wrote: > ...I meant the original poster. What did he want remote control > by Ethernet for? > > So, what was the reason for this remote control in the first place. > Then we could possibly offer or create a better solution.
Lets ask...over on the right thread. He originally said... Pete Flaherty wrote: > is there a facility to send commands to the mvpmc via telnet or http?, > that would allow a remote computer/server to control the mvp ? which could use more details. > And would anyone but me find it useful ? I don't have a pressing need for it, but I'd probably make use of it at some point. I have pondered the idea of using a remote UI as a workaround for the small fonts. Though that doesn't seem like the most efficient solution to that problem... A remote web service does open up some possibilities, like hacking MythWeb so that instead of streaming a video in flash (haven't tried it, but I've read MythWeb can do this now) it would play it on the MVP. Then you could essentially use MythWeb as your primary UI. (Though the MythWeb UI for browsing recordings is pretty horrendous in the version I'm using. It does excel at showing listings and managing schedules.) -Tom ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Mvpmc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mvpmc-users mvpmc wiki: http://mvpmc.wikispaces.com/
