I would;d think the idea would be for MLO to provide its own cloud service - along the lines of the RunKeeper iPhone App : http://runkeeper.com/ - or dare I say it, ToodleDo.
This would then enable the MLO folks to host the data and provide access widgets for whatever device they wanted. A web based interface would be real nice too. I don't see why you'd want to sync using Outlook / exchange / mobleMe etc. Phil Reaston On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Dominique GEORGES < dominique.geor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Let's assume Cloud Sync is good and secure. > > For NON professional people it is quiet expensive ! > 79 euros / year. > > Once you start with, you are in trouble to stop, as your data are on > their servers. > > Not everyone is able to pay such an amount of money. > This is alsoo a reason why I prefer a sync tool mi ActiveSync working > with BlueTooth with nearly all the smartphones, except with one of the > most expensive one, the iPhone ! > > I have an iPhone, and I sync it once a week/month because of this > stupid view of god Steve, who thin his view is THE view. > > Having ActiveSync working with iPhone would make it unbeatable... > > Back on the subject. Cloud sync requires trust in the cloud, MobileMe > could have it as part of Apple, others, small one, starters, ... > certainly NOT. It requires also some free money to pay for that > service... > Even for an Exchange Server, not everyone (simple quidam) has access > to such a server ! > > For me, the best solutions are : > - bluetooth like activeSync, for everyone > - cloud sync, for more rich persons. > > Regards, > Dominique > > On Mar 22, 7:06 pm, Ron Stockfleth <ron.stockfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am fervent about cloud syncing, but then I don't have your trust > > issues. > > > > I have a desktop computer, a netbook, iPhone, and an iPad (early next > > month) that I need to keep all in sync, and cloud computing is the > > best way to do that in my opinion. > > > > I agree that automatic syncing is the way to go, and in my experience > > cloud computing is better at this than local syncing. I have kept my > > Outlook data automatically in sync between desktop and laptop > > computers for several years now using Exchange Server (cloud). With > > the iPhone and soon-to-be-acquired iPad, I have recently switched to > > Apple's MobileMe cloud syncing service. Although I have used the > > MobileMe service for only 3 weeks, so far it has automatically synced > > my contacts, calendar, and email seamlessly between Outlook on 2 of my > > computers and my iPhone. I have several apps on my iPhone that don't > > offer cloud computing, but require local syncing. None of these local > > syncing apps are automatic. They all require initiating the sync on > > both the iPhone and the target computer, and in some cases have > > required me to reset the IP address, hardly automatic. > > > > I have only tried locally syncing my data on those apps requiring > > local syncs between my desktop computer and my iPhone. I have not > > tried to locally sync my data between desktop and laptop computers. My > > experience in trying to do this with 2 computers and with a pocket PC > > as a conduit between the 2 computers never gave me decent results. So > > for now, on those apps that require local syncing, my data is > > "trapped" on just one of my computers. If I could find alternative > > apps that offer cloud syncing, I would drop my local syncing apps in a > > heart beat. > > > > Saying all of this, I wouldn't mind having local syncing as a backup > > syncing methodology in those rare cases where I am on the road with a > > laptop and my iPhone where there is no service coverage. In this > > isolated case, I would be able to locally sync my data between my > > iPhone and laptop until I had coverage again. But I will definitely > > use cloud computing anytime that I can. > > > > As service coverage and devices that can access that coverage become > > more and more pervasive, developers will be wise to adopt cloud > > computing as their customer base will demand it. > > > > Ron > > > > On Mar 22, 5:22 am, Dominique GEORGES <dominique.geor...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Andrey, > > > > > I'm really not fervent of cloud sync ! > > > Again, this implies our date (private, professional, ...) have to stay > > > somewhere, where we do NOT have any control, and really do not know > > > what happens with our data. > > > > > I don't trust this. > > > > > I highly prefer a local sync mechanism, as esy as your application is > > > to use. > > > I hate non automatic actions, required by users to be synced. > > > > > Like on an iPhone, to plug the stupid cable to sync with outlook, ... > > > while we have bluetooth which do the job for us, everytime, ... ! > > > This is what I need for MLO also ! > > > > > A sync tool that is full automatic, that does not require Internet to > > > be used, and that can work on a locally basis (PC <--> iPhone) > > > > > Regards, > > > Dominique > > > > > On Mar 22, 9:50 am, "Andrey Tkachuk (MLO)" > > > > > <for...@mylifeorganized.net> wrote: > > > > Since Outlook does not support hierarchy it it not possible to assign > > > > task imported from Outlook to any project in MLO. MLO will not parse > > > > the UDF fields and will not move the tasks to projects after sync > with > > > > Outlook. The only way to keep hierarchy is to sync one MLO file to > > > > other directly (using different methods like FTP sync, USB drive, or > > > > third party syncing). We are also working on cloud sync which will > > > > help you to keep all your MLO applications in sync with single > > > > database. > > > > > > A. > > > > > > On Mar 21, 9:21 pm, Thomas <trosq...@abo.fi> wrote: > > > > > > > My setup: > > > > > - Home computer with MLO > > > > > - Work computer with MLO > > > > > - Nokia E52 work phone > > > > > - Task syncing through Outlook 2007 and Exchange on all devices. > > > > > > > My problem: > > > > > Tasks are synced fine between all devices through exchange and > > > > > outlook, but when automatically imported to MLO through outlook, > the > > > > > project dependency for the task is missing. So when I create a task > on > > > > > my work computer and assign to what project it belongs to, it is > > > > > imported to my home MLO setup but without the project dependency. > My > > > > > home MLO setup sees this tasks as "new" and assigned to the "inbox" > > > > > folder in MLO, instead of the project it belongs to. Contexts > > > > > exchanged fine using outlook categories. I know I can embed the > > > > > project and context names as being part of the task name, but does > MLO > > > > > parse this information from the task and organize it correctly? > > > > > > > My question: > > > > > Is it possible to setup my environment so, that a task in one MLO > > > > > setup is transferred to its correct project in another MLO setup, > and > > > > > not as a "new" task when it is imported?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MyLifeOrganized" group. > To post to this group, send email to mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mylifeorganized%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to mylifeorgani...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
