I actually wouldn't have a problem moderating the false positives and
approving them. Coarse, this is all just theoretical untill we get some
kind of official word from the MySQL team (You guys listening there?) :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Werby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Eric Fitzgerald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: Signal to Noise Ratio...
> "Eric Fitzgerald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can understand the concern of longer delays in moderation. My problem
> > with anti spam filters is simply because they are too much like
anti-virus
> > filters. TOO many false positives.
>
> Since you were volunteering...why not volunteer to moderate the false
> positives and approve them if appropriate? Seriously though, the procmail
> rules I mentioned have an optional facility that notifies senders of false
> positives and requires them to re-post the message with a supplied
password
> to bypass the filter the second time. It's something to consider since
this
> is a problem with no perfect solution.
>
> --
> Steve Werby
> President, Befriend Internet Services LLC
> http://www.befriend.com/
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
